Having been alone for a long time, I finally caved under the immense pressure to start some sort of online dating. The internet has made many things more efficient it seems. We can shop, manage our bank accounts, book holidays and even find love without leaving our house. Or in my case the various places people permit me to sleep since I technically became homeless.
I got a discount for one of the ones you have to pay for at first. I thought if I’m paying, my success rate should be significantly higher, because if I’m paying for love I better get it damn it. I had very little success, I seem to attract weirdos. This could have something to do with the fact I put strange things in the various description boxes, forgetting that irony is very hard to actually read. Long story short with that one, I spoke to one person who had an unhealthy obsession with the Linkin Park guy.
My subscription ran out and I demanded my money back under the principle I paid for love and am still lonely. I didn’t get my money back.
Then I moved onto the likes of Tinder and Bumble and I have learned a few things.
- Women get a lot more attention.
Despite my personality, I somehow know and talk to a large number of people. I have a diverse range of contacts from different backgrounds, ethnicities and gender. I know attractive women and I know plain looking women, all of them have literally hundreds of ‘likes’ or whatever you call it on Tinder and the like. Straight away their phones lit up with all the interest they were getting. They all have dozens of conversations going on at the same time, landing them in the comfortable position of being able to discard men on a whim knowing they’ll be easily replaced. There are many possible reasons for this, which I will laboriously go into for the sake of more words. I will also place links within my article, feel no pressure to follow them, I do so for SEO purposes, I don’t even check the content really. Also, I’m not necessarily complaining that women have it ‘easier’ on online dating, the old adage ‘quality not quantity’ comes to mind (one friend had a conversation that started with a request that she pee on a guy, not even a hello first). Not to mention, throughout history women have had a hard time of it, so it’s about time they had an advantage somewhere.
As a man with various friends who are also men, I can attest that men are pathetic. We’re either desperately needy and emotionally unstable, or we’re overly ‘macho’ and sex obsessed, viewing each sexual experience as some sort of conquest. The former can be somewhat overbearing, and the latter are pricks. However, both type leads men to swipe right for just about anyone. Women on the other hand, tend to swipe only those they are attracted to, which is sort of the point.
There’s also that pesky business of evolution to consider. As much as we like to think we’re intelligent, logical beings that have distanced themselves from the animals, all that means is that we’re deluded. Everything ultimately comes down to survival and the continuation of the species. Even if you definitely know that you don’t want children, I’m afraid the instincts are still there, secretly controlling your bodies and your emotions. Over the years, men have merely been the provider of sperm, often going from woman to woman in a bid to spread humanity as far as it can possibly go. We are now victims of our own success to some degree, with population rapidly spiralling out of control. Women on the other hand, had to do most of the heavy lifting carrying little shits around in their wombs for nine months, painfully squeezing them out of their vaginas (which would often result in death, either by bleeding or infection, before the marvel of modern medicine).
This would go someway to explain the Tinder phenomenon. Men’s continual right swiping is reminiscent of them going from woman to woman depositing their DNA. Men are less picky when it comes to choosing potential mates, often coming down to ‘do they have a vagina?’. Women on the other hand, with the risk of becoming pregnant always in the back of their minds, won’t willingly throw themselves at just anyone. It has to be worth the risk. Or the person in question has to have good strong genes to create a better child (even when there are no plans to have a child). The potential mate has to be able to defend said child through to adulthood. Also, as already established, men are either pathetic or pricks, so there’s certainly more reason to be picky leading to less arbitrary swipes.
- Everyone claims to love travel.
One of the creators of Tinder went on to develop Bumble, on which I also experimentally made an account. The result of which is more loneliness. I see Bumble as a more middleclass Tinder. Make an account and have a look and you’ll see what I mean.
The twist to Bumble, is that women have to make the ‘first move’ once matched it is up to them to make contact, because unfortunately we live in a time where men should be treated as sinister sex pests until proven otherwise. I would complain, but I realise several paragraphs ago I discussed how a man’s ice breaker was asking a woman to piss on him, so I don’t have much of a case.
On my excursions into the world of Bumble I have noticed that roughly 110% of people claim to be lovers of travel. This seemingly innocuous statement irks me. I find it irksome, and that’s not a word I take lightly. One, people seem to think the idea of travel makes them seem like better people. Two, everyone’s idea of travel seems to involve just sitting on some sand in a hot place. Three, pointlessly flinging yourself around the world will not bring you any form of contentment. If you’re so miserable where you are, chances are you’ll be miserable elsewhere too.
I hate travel. Anyone that says they love it is either a liar, an idiot or a combination of the two. A statement which is also my description on the cursed app.
- People will exploit filters, group shots and fancy angles to make themselves look more appealing.
Whilst I shouldn’t judge people for this, I really judge people for this. Having five pictures on your profile, all of them group shots is infuriating. Which one are you? If you do it in the hope people will think your more attractive friend is you then you’re in for a disappointing date. If you’re doing it because you’re stood next to your less attractive friends and therefore look better by comparison, then you’re a bad friend, and they’ll be using the same group shot in the hope that people think that they are you, in which case they’re in for a disappointing date.
Ever since Snapchat gave people the ability to stick bunny ears on their head, squish their face inwards and make their eyes big enough to pass as an anime character (look at me referencing anime, I don’t watch that shit!), online dating has been awash with these blemish free pictures. Once again, this is setting everyone up for disappointment.
Unfortunately, the fancy angles aspect is mostly employed by women as an unfortunate result of centuries of patriarchy treating women as meat. Whereas men can proudly sport a larger frame or work hard on perfecting their beer belly without too much judgement, women beyond a certain size are often discarded. Therefore, the larger woman will take shots from higher angles and only of their face, giving the illusion that they are not a larger woman. Which is madness, madness I say! Post a picture of you, if people don’t like you for you, they’re not worth your time! Unless they don’t like you for you because you’re a bellend, in which case be less of a bellend.
Surely, the logical thing to do is post the worst possible picture of you. If people are still interested, you know they’re taking it seriously and not fucking about!
- Full-time mummy is apparently a thing.
Having set my Tinder and Bumble to show me women, I don’t know if there are a lot of profiles saying ‘full time daddy’, I hope there is so there’s at least some sort of balance and I don’t come across as a misogynist. I try my hardest not to be any kind of ist. I mean, I’ve already said men are pricks lots of times, so I should be safe. Anyway, if you’ve got ‘Full Time Mummy’ as your career, it means you are unemployed, just put that you are unemployed.
Parenthood is hard work sure, but it’s not a career. All it does is make people think you have very little going on beyond your offspring. My mother is a fulltime mental health nurse, when she comes home, she then looks after her 9 year old daughter, does that mean she moonlights as a mummy? If your relationship deteriorated and you have your kids on the weekend, does that make you a part time parent? When your child is at school, is that an extended coffee break? Or is that when you catch up on all that paperwork that comes from ensuring your offspring survives another day? What kind of career progression is there for a full-time mummy? Do you get to become a manager of team of other mummies?
Not only is this self-aggrandising, but it’s implying that the thousands of mothers/fathers who work, are lesser parents, despite you know, working long hours to provide an income to pay for their children before coming up and taking care of their children. Every parent is a full time parent, unless their children are robots that can be turned off three days a week.
- I’m quite unlikable and likely to die alone.
This one speaks for itself.